051410-cate-marilyn-300.jpgEvan Agostini/Apphoto; Courtesy of The Everett Collection
May 14, 2010 @ 4:00 pm

Naomi Watts has been tapped to star as Marilyn Monroe in a biopic based on the book Blonde by Joyce Carol Oates, which chronicled the actress’s infamous rise to stardom and steamy love life. The Australian beauty already has some experience playing the legendary blonde—she channeled one of Monroe’s most iconic style moments at the 2008 Met Gala in a white pleated Thierry Mugler halter dress, pin curls and racy red lips. The movie is set to begin filming in January 2011.

Joyann King

Like this post? Tell us what you think!

(17) Comments

(+) Add a comment

Was someone smoking something when they hired her for this role? Naomi doesn’t have a tenth of the curves that Marilyn did. Nor does she have a tenth of the sex appeal. Marilyn was a size 12, what is Naomi, a zero??
Scarlett Johannson, anyone?

-Rae on May 14th, 2010

Too bad Anna NIcole Smith is gone.

-Stella on May 15th, 2010

Agreed Rae! I hope they plan on making her gain weight (and curves) in order to play someone who was famous for being curvy and gorgeous. Not a good choice, imo.

-SKG on May 15th, 2010

I would have loved to see an unknown pay the part.
I love Naomi, but I am guessing to look the part they will have to add a lot of padding to her hips and breast. I think her acting will be excellent, but to look so different from an icon that has so much visual recognition (in many ways her main claim to fame) makes the choice strange.

-dbray on May 15th, 2010

A cup breast size doesn’t match a d cup natural like M.M. Noami is good for the psycho roles in movies but not this sultry type of a kitten that Marilyn was. Scarlett would not be a good choice either as she is petite and packs on the makeup.
Marilyn was known as a natural that used very little makeup which was here huge draw>

-not on May 15th, 2010

marilyn had natural charm and charisma and the camera loved her, she had an amazing body and was funny – naomi always looks so unhappy and unimpressed i think, and is shapeless and she IS NOT THE RIGHT CHOICE AT ALL!!

-anne on May 15th, 2010

Someone told me Roman Polanski raped Marilyn when she was thirteen. I want to see that rich and famous, extremely talented, highly gifted director thrown in the darkest, deepest pit forever, after being cut to ribbons with a rusty razor, then abused by Bubba, the big negro guy, with the tattoos. I want to see that the Americans, who were once a great Nation, but are now just a third rate, bankrupt, back water zone of obese idiots get what they want to satisfy their blood lust.

-Kali Deva on May 16th, 2010

won’t fly….this woman looks nothing like Marilyn….too bad..waste of time

-jabfrc on May 16th, 2010

NO WAY.

The figure is extremely different and Marilyn had more glamor.

-Robie Irwin-Casanova on May 16th, 2010

I am amazed that a racist bigot like Kali Deva actually has the nerve to comment on a pedophile in the midst of their own ignorance.

-Tired of Ignorance on May 16th, 2010

not a good choice

-vicky on May 16th, 2010

Marilyn Monroe was not a size 12 in the same sense of what a size 12 is today.

Labels and sizing have changed, and Marilyn was curvy and did have hips and breast, but she was tiny. She was not a 12 or a 16 or a 14 — not even close.

In today’s sizes she would be a 8 or even a 6.

Tiny waist + ample breasts + curvy yet small hips … Just look at pictures of her, esp. some of the racier ones where you can see her body beneath all the heavy clothes.

From her official site:

Height: 5 feet 5 1/2 inches
Weight: Varied, 115 – 120 lbs.
Measurements: 37-23-36 (Studio’s Claim); 35-22-35 (Dressmaker’s Claim)

She was quite tiny.

-Victoria on May 16th, 2010

Victoria’s right. I went to a museum exhibit that featured a lot of Marilyn’s clothing. I am a size 10. I would not have fit into her clothes. It was sort of a bummer. I’d always thought we were the same size, but her waist was REDONKULOUSLY tiny. That said, she may have been close to a size 12 when she was shooting The Misfits.

-Queen Bee on May 17th, 2010

Okay, Victoria – that is much more detail on a deceased actresses measurements than I could have ever found myself. Even if she would be a size 8 or 6, I still say Naomi is wrong wrong wrong for the part. She is at most a size 2, has almost zero sex appeal in my opinion, and frankly doesn’t seem to have the acting chops to pull this one off. Also, I know Scarlett wears a lot of make-up, but she is closer to Marilyn’s frame and height (she claims to be about 5’4″) and sex appeal than any other living actress I can think of…it would be much easier for her to take off the make-up than for Naomi to increase her bust and bottom to Marilyn’s quality and quantitiy.

-Rae on May 17th, 2010

Vanity Sizing. That is what we have today. 0 is a 4 and 4 is an 8 and 8 is a 12 and so on and so forth. They do that to make “in denial” women feel skinny and buy more clothes ignoring the fact that they are actually 4 sizes bigger if they actually did their measurements. It’s true. Think about that next time you eat a 3 person meal all by yourself at a restaurant.

-CommonSense on May 17th, 2010

Wow, okay CommonSense. Not sure who you are pointing your finger at with that comment, but after working at Banana Republic, I’m quite aware of vanity sizing. But just because I am a size 10/12 doesn’t mean I eat a three person meal at restaurants – it just means I’m not skinny as a rail, nor am I overweight. Not everyone is built to be a size 4.

-Rae on May 17th, 2010

Can anyone say age. MM was in her early twenties when she did gentlemen prefer blonds. NW is now 42 years old.
So that means that NW is to old for the part. ENOUGH SAID.

-bridget@gregoryboat.com on May 17th, 2010

advertisement

Add Comment

You must submit your e-mail when posting.

Back to Top

HTML and URLS prohibited

*Note: Inappropriate language may prevent a comment from posting.